GNU OCTAVE DEVREMENT FOR LOOP SERIAL

GNU OCTAVE DEVREMENT FOR LOOP SERIAL

addtodate Add Q amount of time (with units F) to the serial datenum, D. addproperty Create a new property named NAME in graphics object H. addpref Add the preference PREF and associated value VAL to the named preference group GROUP. addpath Add named directories to the function search path. addlistener Register FCN as listener for the property PROP of the graphics object H. add_input_event_hook Add the named function or function handle FCN to the list of functions to call periodically when Octave is waiting for input. acsch Compute the inverse hyperbolic cosecant of each element of X. acscd Compute the inverse cosecant in degrees for each element of X. acsc Compute the inverse cosecant in radians for each element of X. acoth Compute the inverse hyperbolic cotangent of each element of X. acotd Compute the inverse cotangent in degrees for each element of X. acot Compute the inverse cotangent in radians for each element of X. acosh Compute the inverse hyperbolic cosine for each element of X.

acosd Compute the inverse cosine in degrees for each element of X. acos Compute the inverse cosine in radians for each element of X. accumdim Create an array by accumulating the slices of an array into the positions defined by their subscripts along a specified dimension. accumarray Create an array by accumulating the elements of a vector into the positions defined by their subscripts. Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, John W.Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 7.

Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, ijourneaux, 7.

Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, (continued).

I also have interesting results about the behaviour of JIT on thisīenchmark suite, but that's for another thread I think. We're still a long way from the performances of Octave 3.4.3 (or even Printfd 2972.6 2833.3 evol: -4.7%Īll results are in ms: median over 10 replications [mean absolute The BEGIN/END macros are still there, but of course they can be removed Improvement using a constructor/destructor pair and templated classes Ok, I have tried harder and finally obtained a (significant ?) speed Significant improvement in this direction. I have tried improving thisĬonstructor/destructor approach with inlining, but couldn't get a

Properly and with inlining, I don't see why it would be inefficientĪnd perhaps we could eliminate the BEGIN/END macros?Īs you know, using a constructor/destructor pair is actually what theīEGIN/END macros currently do. Rather see that go inside a constructor/destructor pair. I don't much like having to manually match up new/delete, so I'd Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions

Gnu octave devrement for loop